Women in ministry, particularly behind the pulpit:
One of the problems in answering this question (for me) is the modern misconception of what being in ministry is. Biblical ministry is service. Coming from that standpoint not only can women be in ministry
but they must be! The prevailing view for most seems to be that what happens behind a pulpit, i.e. preaching is “being in ministry”. I do not accept that premise at all. My experience has taught me that 5 percent of service to the body of Christ occurs behind the pulpit and ninety-five percent occurs at other times and places while caring for the sheep.
I have no problem with a woman preaching, prophesying, or even teaching. I do, however, have a concern with a woman operating as the authoritative head of the local church in any of the 5 fold (pastor, teacher, evangelist, apostle, and prophet) ministry capacities. While I understand that this is a debatable matter, I am personally convinced that the scriptures teach against this concept.
The scripture presents man as the head of woman. This concept is especially true in marriage (
Ephe 5:23) but is also true for the entire creation:
1 Cor 11:3 “ Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God
”
1 Cor 11:8-10 “For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9 neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.”
In my understanding
this doesn’t relegate women to a second class role. It simply means that the final seat of authority should rest with a male figure because this is the way God designed it.

When the scripture says, “the head of woman is man…” this just means that man is in authority over woman. This scenario reminds me very much of the role of a Vice President in relation to the President.
There are some other scriptures that usually trouble people because at
first glance they seem archaic or chauvinistic to our modern sensibilities. If you look at them in their context, though, I believe they are not chauvinistic at all; but rather, they are designed to preserve a Godly sense of order. Look at these:
1 Tim 2:9-12
9 I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, 10 but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God.
11 A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.
This passage along with another in the book of 1 Corinthians could
wrongly be interpreted to mean that women should function like mutes! However, the same apostle who penned these words also said things like: “
each of you can prophesy”, “
When you come together, everyone has a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. All of these must be done for the strengthening of the church”, “
Now to each one the manifestation of the Spirit is given for the common good”, etc. Clearly the concept he is teaching
is not that women literally can not speak in the church. In my opinion he is applying the principle of “man as the head of woman”. Women are not to be the ultimate authority over men because this is not the way God designed the church or even the world to function. The practical application as it relates to five fold ministry (the governing body of the church) is that a woman may teach but can’t be the final authority over what is taught as acceptable doctrine. Likewise a woman may help pastor (my wife certainly does

) but she may not be the final authority as it relates to correcting the sheep. Another way to express what I am trying to say would be that
women can function at all levels of ministry as long as they operate under the authority of male leadership and are not the head of the entity. Many people point to Debra as the bench mark for female leadership and yet when you examine her role closely I think you will find that she came to power much in the same way a Vice President does. A President abdicated his responsibilities through death, neglect, or absence and for that reason something unusual had to occur… the Vice President had to fulfill what was originally designed for a President.
I have spent years examining this concept and I am well aware that many disagree with me. My hope is that people will be able to consider it without lumping me into a broad classification that is inapplicable like a classification as a chauvinist. When people raise objections about equality, better covenants, or Joyce Meyer…. It is clear to me that they missed the point I was making.
I look forward to hearing everyone’s point of view on this subject. Perhaps we will all come to better understanding together. (I enjoyed reading the previous posts already). Lastly, I want to say that all of us work best when we are in the flow of authority (whether male or female) and I appreciate the Godly women in my life that have so greatly taught, encourage, and blessed me.
Love
E
"The man that has the experience is not at the mercy of the man who merely has an argument"
Smith Wigglesworth